Peter Mead on his blog Biblical Preaching had a good idea for considering those God has given to nurture us. Check it out here.
Category Archives: Pastoring
CHAP. XXIII. The Parson’s Completenesse.
THe Countrey Parson desires to be all to his Parish, and not onely a Pastour, but a Lawyer also, and a Phisician. Therefore hee endures not that any of his Flock should go to Law; but in any Controversie, that they should resort to him as their Judge. To this end, he hath gotten to himself some insight in things ordinarily incident and controverted, by experience, and by reading some initiatory treatises in the Law, with Daltons Justice of Peace, and the Abridgements of the Statutes, as also by discourse with men of that profession, whom he hath ever some cases to ask, when he meets with them; holding that rule, that to put men to discourse of that, wherin they are most eminent, is the most gain full way of Conversation. Yet when ever any controversie is brought to him, he never decides it alone, but sends for three or four of the ablest of the Parish to hear the cause with him, whom he makes to deliver their opinion first; out of which he gathers, in case he be ignorant himself, what to hold; and so the thing passeth with more authority, and lesse envy. In judging, he followes that, which is altogether right; so that if the poorest man of the Parish detain but a pin unjustly from the richest, he absolutely restores it as a Judge; but when he hath so done, then he assumes the Parson, and exhorts to Charity. Neverthelesse, there may happen somtimes some cases, wherein he chooseth to permit his Parishioners rather to make use of the Law, then himself: As in cases of an obscure and dark nature, not easily determinable by Lawyers themselves; or in cases of high consequence, as establishing of inheritances: or Lastly, when the persons in difference are of a contentious disposition, and cannot be gained, but that they still fall from all compromises that have been made. But then he shews them how to go to Law, even as Brethren, and not as enemies, neither avoyding therfore one anothers company, much lesse defaming one another. Now as the Parson is in Law, so is he in sicknesse also: if there be any of his flock sick, hee is their Physician, or at least his Wife, of whom in stead of the qualities of the world, he asks no other, but to have the skill of healing a wound, or helping the sick. But if neither himseife, nor his wife have the skil, and his means serve, hee keepes some young practicioner in his house for the benefit of his Parish, whom yet he ever exhorts not to exceed his bounds, but in tickle cases to call in help. If all fail, then he keeps good correspondence with some neighbour Phisician, and entertaines him for the Cure of his Parish. Yet is it easie for any Scholer to attaine to such a measure of Phisick, as may be of much use to him both for himself, and others. This is done by seeing one Anatomy, reading one Book of Phisick, having one Herball by him. And let Fernelius be the Phisick Authour, for he writes briefly, neatly, and judiciously; especially let his Method of Phisick be diligently perused, as being the practicall part, and of most use. Now both the reading of him, and the knowing of herbs may be done at such times, as they may be an help, and a recreation to more divine studies, Nature serving Grace both in comfort of diversion, and the benefit of application when need requires; as also by way of illustration, even as our Saviour made plants and seeds to teach the people: for he was the true householder, who bringeth out of his treasure things new and old; the old things of Philosophy, and the new of Grace; and maketh the one serve the other. And I conceive, our Saviour did this for three reasons: first, that by familiar things hee might make his Doctrine slip the more easily into the hearts even of the meanest. Secondly, that labouring people (whom he chiefly considered) might have every where monuments of his Doctrine, remembring in gardens, his mustard-seed, and lillyes; in the field, his seed-corn, and tares; and so not be drowned altogether in the works of their vocation, but sometimes lift up their minds to better things, even in the midst of their pains. Thirdly, that he might set a Copy for Parsons. In the knowledge of simples, wherein the manifold wisedome of God is wonderfully to be seen, one thing would be carefully observed; which is, to know what herbs may be used in stead of drugs of the same nature, and to make the garden the shop: For home-bred medicines are both more easie for the Parsons purse, and more familiar for all mens bodyes. So, where the Apothecary useth either for loosing, Rubarb, or for binding, Bolearmena, the Parson useth damask or white Roses for the one, and plantaine, shepherds purse, knot-grasse for the other, and that with better successe. As for spices, he doth not onely prefer home-bred things before them, but condemns them for vanities, and so shuts them out of his family, esteeming that there is no spice comparable, for herbs, to rosemary, time, savoury, mints; and for seeds, to Fennell, and Carroway seeds. Accordingly, for salves, his wife seeks not the city, but preferrs her garden and fields before all outlandish gums. And surely hyssope, valerian, mercury, adders tongue, yerrow, melilot, and Saint Johns wort made into a salve; And Elder, camomill, mallowes, comphrey and smallage made into a Poultis, have done great and rare cures. In curing of any, the Parson and his Family use to premise prayers, for this is to cure like a Parson, and this raiseth the action from the Shop, to the Church. But though the Parson sets forward all Charitable deeds, yet he looks not in this point of Curing beyond his own Parish, except the person bee so poor, that he is not able to reward the Phisician: for as hee is Charitable, so he is just also. Now it is a justice and debt to the Commonwealth he lives in, not to incroach on others Professions, but to live on his own. And justice is the ground of Charity.
I’m not sure whether this chapter reveals more of Herbert’s idealism and overly-optimistic view of what one can do, or if it shows the difference in a few hundred years. In Herbert’s time a man of learning could study different fields and practice in them without the bother of professional credentials, associations or liability insurance. In fact many ministers have made important contributions to different fields of science, technology and medicine in the past.
W hat I do find applicable in this chapter for modern ministers is that we should make our ministry broad and holistic. It can be very stifling to focus only on theology and the study of Scriptures that we lose the ability to make the connection with God’s creation and the world that most of our parishioners live in. We should be able to see the practical connection between ‘Blessed are the peacemakers’ and working to solve disputes, between the doctrine of the Incarnation and some basic knowledge of healthy living.
I love the image of a Country Parson brewing a medicine with herbs from his garden and giving them with a prayer for healing and a loving touch.
(Photo of Barwinnoch Herbs in South Ayrshire by eggybird)
It would have made a great song!
We gather, as many churches do for a devotional reading and song before we divide up into our Sunday school classes. It’s led by a layman so I was sitting in a pew and just before the the service started a wave sorta rose through the pews (back to front instead of side to side). Instead of cheering everyone rose saying “What was that?”
After the front pews jumped up we saw some sort of ‘critter’ bolt from the congregation into the choir loft. When it climbed up the wall we saw what it was — a squirrel!
I made an admittedly pathetic attempt to grab it. There is simply no training in seminary to prepare you for catching rodents that are circling the chancel, weaving in and out of organ pipes. The assembly was mostly made up of little ol’ ladies, so I was glad when, after a few minutes of chasing the squirrel, Danny came in. Danny is very big and very country, just the sort of man you want to show up when your trying to catch an animal.
Danny is apparently more intimidating to squirrels than I am. It might be his size and obvious comfort chasing animals, then again it might be because his momma is famous for her squirrel dumplings. Any way when Danny entered the chancel the squirrel decided to get out of there. It had climbed nearly to the ceiling, it spread its arms and flew over our heads. We had a flying squirrel.
After a nice chase through the narthex among very confused parishioners and very excited children the squirrel shot into my office. I stood outside my office listening to the thud – bump – SLAM going on inside. I tried to smile nicely to folks as I imagined going inside to find squished squirrel bits all over my books. After a minute or two, Danny emerged, beaming with pride and holding his jacket over his head. It was bundled around what had to an extremely panicked squirrel. The squirrel was set free unharmed and the morning service continued as normal. I did ask our organist to play Ray Stevens for the offertory.
(By the way Danny has since joined the Army and is serving his second round in Iraq. You’re in our prayers.)
Tools of the Trade: Nelson Signature Series Bible
Probably the most basic tool for ministry — the preacher’s Bible. What to use in the pulpit, teaching, personal devotion, visiting and outdoor weddings? Personally I have a study Bible for my own reading, a pocket New Testament for visiting and a Nelson Signature Series Bible for preaching. It is the New King James Version, which might not be the best translation, but after looking for (and stressing over) the perfect translation I realized there is no such animal. I chose this for what may seem very superficial criteria, that is it looks and feels so nice. The leather is very soft and it is a very nice size.
After a few months of preaching, using different Bibles to do so I came to the conclusion that the size of a Bible (should be comfortably held with one hand) the appearance of the text (legible print, simple layout) and the absence of distracting study notes were as important as anything else in choosing a regular pulpit Bible. I prefer other translations for study (especially the ESV) but the New King James sounds familiar to folks who grew up with the KJV but is understandable to those who didn’t.
So what’s your preferred translation? For fellow ministers, what is your primary pulpit Bible and why?
The cup that we bless …
Being one of the few full time ministers among the country churches in our presbytery has meant that I’ve often had the task of helping serve many of our smaller country churches when they are without a pastor. This has meant getting lost on many rambling county roads, preaching to congregations of 2-4 people at times and moderating some pretty interesting session* meetings. It has also meant serving communion when congregations were without an ordained minister for extended periods of time.
On one such occasion I met with a little country church as soon as I could hurry in from my own service. Their worship was already in progress, one of the elders had spoken and I came in to administer the sacrament. The communion table was set, the people were reverent. I was out of breath but managed to read the words of institution. As I removed the covering from the bread I noticed the standard white pieces of unleavened bread so many churches use — nothing unusual. I took the cover off of the tray of individual cups, the color of the juice looked a little light … but oh well. As I said the prayer of consecration I was concerned about how old the juice must be but figured it wouldn’t hurt me. Then I ate the cracker and drank … Grapico !
No one had thought to bring the Welches so one of the elders ran up to the nearest gas station (no store for 20 miles was going to be open on a Sunday) and got two cans of grape soda out of the Coke machine.
Now I make it a habit of carrying my own elements when I’m asked to serve communion.
(*the governing board of the local congregation)
Image: country road by John Beagle
CHAP. XXII. The Parson in Sacraments.
THe Countrey Parson being to administer the Sacraments, is at a stand with himself, how or what behaviour to assume for so holy things. Especially at Communion times he is in a great confusion, as being not only to receive God, but to break, and administer him. Neither findes he any issue in this, but to throw himself down at the throne of grace, saying, Lord, thou knowest what thou didst, when thou appointedst it to be done thus; therefore doe thou fulfill what thou didst appoint; for thou art not only the feast, but the way to it. At Baptisme, being himselfe in white, he requires the presence of all, and Baptizeth not willingly, but on Sundayes, or great dayes. Hee admits no vaine or idle names, but such as are usuall and accustomed. Hee says that prayer with great devotion, where God is thanked for calling us to the knowledg of his grace, Baptisme being a blessing, that the world hath not the like. He willingly and cheerfully crosseth the child, and thinketh the Ceremony not onely innocent, but reverend. He instructeth the God-fathers, and God-mothers, that it is no complementall or light thing to sustain that place, but a great honour, and no less burden, as being done both in the presence of God, and his Saints, and by way of undertaking for a Christian soul. He adviseth all to call to minde their Baptism often; for if wise men have thought it the best way of preserving a state to reduce it to its principles by which it grew great; certainly, it is the safest course for Christians also to meditate on their Baptisme often (being the first step into their great and glorious calling) and upon what termes, and with what vowes they were Baptized. At the times of the Holy Communion, he first takes order with the Church- Wardens, that the elements be of the best, not cheape, or course, much lesse ill-tasted, or unwholsome. Secondly, hee considers and looks into the ignorance, or carelesness of his flock, and accordingly applies himselfe with Catechizings, and lively exhortations, not on the Sunday of the Communion only (for then it is too late) but the Sunday, or Sundayes before the Communion, or on the Eves of all those dayes. If there be any, who having not received yet, are to enter into this great work, he takes the more pains with them, that hee may lay the foundation of future Blessings. The time of every ones first receiving is not so much by yeers, as by understanding: particularly, the rule may be this: When any one can distinguish the Sacramentall from common bread, knowing the Institution, and the difference, hee ought to receive, of what age soever. Children and youths are usually deferred too long, under pretence of devotion to the Sacrament, but it is for want of Instruction; their understandings being ripe enough for ill things, and why not then for better? But Parents, and Masters should make hast in this, as to a great purchase for their children, and servants; which while they deferr, both sides suffer; the one in wanting many excitings of grace; the other, in being worse served and obeyed. The saying of the Catechism is necessary, but not enough; because to answer in form may still admit ignorance: but the Questions must be propounded loosely and wildely, and then the Answerer will discover what hee is. Thirdly, For the manner of receiving, as the Parson useth all reverence himself, so he administers to none but to the reverent. The Feast indeed requires sitting, because it is a Feast; but man’s unpreparednesse asks kneeling. Hee that comes to the Sacrament, hath the confidence of a Guest, and hee that kneels, confesseth himself an unworthy one, and therefore differs from other Feasters: but hee that sits, or lies, puts up to an Apostle: Contentiousnesse in a feast of Charity is more scandall then any posture. Fourthly, touching the frequency of the Communion, the Parson celebrates it, if not duly once a month, yet at least five or six times in the year; as, at Easter, Christmasse, Whitsuntide, afore and after Harvest, and the beginning of Lent. And this hee doth, not onely for the benefit of the work, but also for the discharge of the Church-wardens, who being to present all that receive not thrice a year; if there be but three Communions, neither can all the people so order their affairs as to receive just at those times, nor the Church-Wardens so well take notice who receive thrice, and who not. The thing that stands out to me most about this chapter is the sense of reverence a minister is to have about the sacrament. Dealing with holy things as part of regular work can numb us to the sacred. And in our already more casual age there seems to be a tendency to downplay things, even be flippant about the sacred. So I notice how Herbert seeks to simply approach the sacraments with an attitude of reverence. Notice it is not simply an appearance of reverence, a show to make the congregation feel somber; rather it is a genuine respect, stemming from humble reflection of the pastor’s own unworthiness to break bread and administer the washing.
The other thing I notice is the way Herbert connects the sacraments to the day to day work of ministry: catechizing, discipling and purchasing the appropriate bread for communion. If the law requires church officers to report on parishioners who don’t take communion as often, then you need to make sure you offer the sacrament often enough that they can commune. This connection of the holiest moments with the most basic tasks of communal life reveals the earthiness of Christianity I think a lot of people miss. This earthiness goes against our natural taste for what is “spiritual” but it is the appropriate consequence of the incarnation. We have sacred moments, and while distinct they are never severed from “ordinary” life. We approach the holy with an attitude of reverence, but never of pretense. And we confidently, even “boldly pray as the children of God”; however, this confidence should never be a glib presumption, but rather an assurance in God’s mercy.
(Image of Chalice from hoyasmeg on flickr)
CHAP. XX. The Parson in Gods stead.
THe Countrey Parson is in Gods stead to his Parish, and dischargeth God what he can of his promises. Wherefore there is nothing done either wel or ill, whereof he is not the rewarder, or punisher. If he chance to finde any reading in anothers Bible, he provides him one of his own. If he finde another giving a poor man a penny, he gives him a tester for it, if the giver be fit to receive it; or if he be of a condition above such gifts, he sends him a good book, or easeth him in his Tithes, telling him when he hath forgotten it, This I do, because at such, and such a time you were charitable. This is in some sort a discharging of God; as concerning this life, who hath promised, that Godlinesse shall be gainfull: but in the other God is his own immediate paymaster, rewarding all good deeds to their full proportion. The Parsons punishing of sin and vice, is rather by withdrawing his bounty and courtesie from the parties offending, or by private, or publick reproof, as the case requires, then by causing them to be presented, or otherwise complained of. And yet as the malice of the person, or hainousness of the crime may be, he is carefull to see condign punishment inflicted, and with truly godly zeal, without hatred to the person, hungreth and thirsteth after righteous punishment of unrighteousnesse. Thus both in rewarding vertue, and in punishing vice, the Parson endeavoureth to be in Gods stead, knowing that Countrey people are drawne, or led by sense, more then by faith, by present rewards, or punishments, more then by future.
I ran into a parishioner with her 4 year old grandson a few days ago. she told me that when she told him “There’s Brother Scott” that he replied, “Where’s God?”. I chuckled but felt the uncomfortable weight of representing God. As protestants in our insistence on the priesthood of all believers, and as modern or post-modern people with the suspicion (or paranoia) of any form of authority, we overlook the aspect of ministry as ‘being in God’s stead’. Older parishioners certainly make the distinction between sign and signified better than the four year old boy I saw the other day, but I think there is a sense of representation we have among people that is easy for us to forget. When we inadequate signs are reminded of this it is humbling and a powerful reminder of the burden of our task.
I’m not sure about Herbert’s emphasis of the representation of God as primarily rewarding and punishing. But there is certainly value in remembering that ministers actions and reactions are to represent the God we serve. If we are called as ambassadors of a Kingdom of Grace, Truth and Peace then we should be gracious, honest and hospitable.
(Image Church of Our Lady of Sinj by load.error)
CHAP. XIX. The Parson in reference. CHAP. XIX. The Parson in reference.
THe Countrey Parson is sincere and upright in all his relations. And first, he is just to his Countrey; as when he is set at an armour, or horse, he borrowes them not to serve the turne, nor provides slight, and unusefull, but such as are every way fitting to do his Countrey true and laudable service, when occasion requires. To do otherwise, is deceit; and therefore not for him, who is hearty, and true in all his wayes, as being the servant of him, in whom there was no guile. Likewise in any other Countrey-duty, he considers what is the end of any Command, and then he suits things faithfully according to that end. Secondly, he carryes himself very respectively, as to all the Fathers of the Church, so especially to his Diocesan, honouring him both in word, and behaviour, and resorting unto him in any difficulty, either in his studies or in his Parish. He observes Visitations, and being there, makes due use of them, as of Clergy councels, for the benefit of the Diocese. And therefore before he comes, having observed some defects in the Ministry, he then either in Sermon, if he preach, or at some other time of the day, propounds among his Brethren what were fitting to be done. Thirdly, he keeps good Correspondence with all the neighbouring Pastours round about him, performing for them any Ministeriall office, which is not to the prejudice of his own Parish. Likewise he welcomes to his house any Minister, how poor or mean soever, with as joyfull a countenance, as if he were to entertain some great Lord. Fourthly, he fulfills the duty, and debt of neighbourhood to all the Parishes which are neer him. For the Apostles rule Philip. 4.[8] being admirable, and large, that we should do whatsoever things are honest, or just, or pure, or lovely, or of good report, if there be any vertue, or any praise, and Neighbourhood being ever reputed, even among the Heathen, as an obligation to do good, rather then to those that are further, where things are otherwise equall, therefore he satisfies this duty also. Especily, if God have sent any calamity either by fire, or famine, to any neighbouring Parish, then he expects no Briefe; but taking his Parish together the next Sunday, or holy-day, and exposing to them the uncertainty of humane affairs, none knowing whose turne may be next, and then when he hath affrighted them with this, exposing the obligation of Charity, and Neighbour-hood, he first gives himself liberally, and then incites them to give; making together a summe either to be sent, or, which were more comfortable, all together choosing some fitt day to carry it themselves, and cheere the Afflicted. So, if any neighbouring village be overburdened with poore, and his owne lesse charged, hee findes some way of releeving it, and reducing the Manna, and bread of Charity to some equality, representing to his people, that the Blessing of God to them ought to make them the more charitable, and not the lesse, lest he cast their neighbours poverty on them also.
We are not alone, as Christians, as Citizens or in whatever vocation we have been called to. Although I don’t understand the specifics Herbert is referring to in part of this chapter (did Country Parsons take up arms in time of war?) it is obvious that Herbert is having us consider our obligations and responsibilities to, as well as our assistance and benefits from the network of relations we have. It would be good for us to consider what we owe to our country and community, as well as our fellow pastors and to all the baptized. How would our communities benefit if ministers, regardless of denomination were to welcome one another as a ‘great Lord’ instead of gossip about ‘those’ churches. Or think of the benefit smaller congregations would gain if larger churches with more resources and wealth were to be charitable as to a neighbour as Herbert suggests. Herbert has a good message for us modern American churches who think very much of our individual lives and individual congregations.
(Image is Eagle Lake Community Church by Vitoden)
CHAP. XVIII. The Parson in Sentinell.
THe Countrey Parson, where ever he is, keeps Gods watch; that is, there is nothing spoken, or done in the Company where he is, but comes under his Test and censure: If it be well spoken, or done, he takes occasion to commend, and enlarge it; if ill, he presently lays hold of it, least the poyson steal into some young and unwary spirits, and possesse them even before they themselves heed it. But this he doth discretely, with mollifying, and suppling words; This was not so well said, as it might have been forborn; We cannot allow this: or else if the thing will admit interpretation; Your meaning is not thus, but thus; or, So farr indeed what you say is true, and well said; but this will not stand. This is called keeping Gods watch, when the baits which the enemy lays in company, are discovered and avoyded: This is to be on Gods side, and be true to his party. Besides, if he perceive in company any discourse tending to ill, either by the wickedness or quarrelsomnesse thereof, he either prevents it judiciously, or breaks it off seasonably by some diversion. Wherein a pleasantness of disposition is of great use, men being willing to sell the interest, and ingagement of their discourses for no price sooner, then that of mirth; whither the nature of man, loving refreshment, gladly betakes it selfe, even to the losse of honour.
As with the last chapter, Herbert reminds us that a minister is a minister always. Here he reminds pastors that others will watch their reaction in conversations, wherever they take place. A minister’s duty of oversight and teaching continues whether the discussion is in the Church hall, at a party or in the marketplace. Although Herbert tempers his instructions by reminding the parson to be discrete, we probably are tempted to see the ideal of a minister correcting others and always ready to ‘test and censure’ as an overbearing busybody. But consider the witness it would be for ministers to politely correct errors instead of tacitly approve of them.
CHAP. XVII. The Parson in Journey.
THe Countrey Parson, when a just occasion calleth him out of his Parish (which he diligently, and strictly weigheth, his Parish being all his joy, and thought) leaveth not his Ministry behind him; but is himselfe where ever he is. Therefore those he meets on the way he blesseth audibly, and with those he overtakes or that overtake him, hee begins good discourses, such as may edify, interposing sometimes some short, and honest refreshments, which may make his other discourses more welcome, and lesse tedious. And when he comes to his Inn, he refuseth not to joyne, that he may enlarge the glory of God, to the company he is in, by a due blessing of God for their safe arrival, and saying grace at meat and at going to bed by giving the Host notice, that he will have prayers in the hall, wishing him to informe his guests thereof, that if any be willing to partake, they may resort thither. The like he doth in the morning, using pleasantly the outlandish proverb, that Prayers and Provender never hinder journey. When he comes to any other house, where his kindred, or other relations give him any authority over the Family, if hee be to stay for a time, hee considers diligently the state thereof to Godward, and that in two points: First, what disorders there are either in Apparell, or Diet, or too open a Buttery, or reading vain books, or swearing, or breeding up children to no Calling, but in idleness, or the like. Secondly, what means of Piety, whether daily prayers be used, Grace, reading of Scriptures, and other good books, how Sundayes, holy-days, and fasting days are kept. And accordingly, as he finds any defect in these, hee first considerswith himseife, what kind of remedy fits the temper of the house best, and then hee faithfully, and boldly applyeth it; yet seasonably, and discreetly, by taking aside the Lord or Lady, or Master and Mistres of the house, and shewing them cleerly, that they respect them most, who wish them best, and that not a desire to meddle with others affairs, but the earnestnesse to do all the good he can, moves him to say thus and thus.
Herbert understands that the minister is always a minister, even in travelling he is to continue his ministry as the occassion provides – blessing and ministering to strangers, continuing in his regular rule of prayer and (if appropriate) overseeing his guest home like his own. Sometimes I enjoy the anonymity of travel, but Herbert reminds me that the ministry is not something we leave when we leave the border of our parish. God can provide opportunities for ministry wherever we go.